You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘campus ministry’ tag.

I got to see The Social Network last night with two of our awesome College Ministers Cohort attendees.

I found it masterful, actually. An excellent window into the world we serve – both the Millennials and college students. Whole college campuses, even. And it’s not just a window, it’s really a fascinating look at Harvard, for one, as well as (of course) the creation of the tool that has become one of our key tools for ministry, Facebook.

The movie certainly has, as my English teacher would say, its “racy page.” More than one, actually. It’s PG-13, and that’s appropriate – not R, but very far from PG. Obviously, watch at your own discretion.

I will post more on this movie, I imagine, but I need to sleep (I’m writing this Friday night).

But I will never write a review that’s nearly as good as the one Christianity Today posted this week. Apparently the author, Alissa Wilkinson, has a connection with the Coalition for Christian Outreach college ministry (I heard that yesterday at the Cohort!), and she is indeed a fairly recent college grad. In any case, it’s an excellent review, and I read it both before and after I saw the movie.

A key blurb:

Most everything about The Social Network is successful, but its real achievement stretches beyond the Facebook story. Decades from now, when we’ve all forgotten what Facebook even was, The Social Network will still tell us what it was to be part of the generation sociologists are calling the Millenials. I’m part of this generation, and I teach students who are, too, and what I see is this: Like Zuckerberg, who argues against advertising that would take away Facebook’s “cool” factor, Millenials care more about constructing their image and gaining influence than having a lot of money. Privilege and wealth are useful tools toward constructing an attractive identity, but knowing the right people, listening to the right music, and being in the right place at the right time is much more important.

Check the rest of it out (it’s really an excellent review), and consider seeing The Social Network. Alissa’s right about what it captures.

—————————————————————————————

[Click to ask questions, comment, or see any comments on this post!]

I believe I first outlined my classification of the “three branches” of college ministry in a post way back in February 2008 (written only a few hundred miles south of here, during the yearlong road trip). I had variously referred to those three branches before and since, including in my book:

  • Campus-based college ministry (including parachurch, denominational, and independent ministries centering their activity on the local campus)
  • Church-based college ministry (ministries overseen within individual churches)
  • Spiritual development at Christian colleges (the specific people or departments in Christian colleges dedicated to student discipleship, often called “spiritual life” or “chaplaincy”) (from Reaching the Campus Tribes, pages 17-18)

Those branches are distinguished, in my mind, by a few major things:

  • Campus integration (the connection of the ministry to the college campus, including where it centers its activity)
  • Oversight (who tends to hire, govern, and evaluate a ministry’s leaders)
  • Function (the way the ministry operates and “feels,” particularly to students)
  • Field reception (the lines the college ministry community has tended to draw between these areas)

While any of these factors might be clearer or fuzzier for an individual ministry, I do feel they fairly well delineate between the various branches. So using this terminology has been really helpful to me.

But as I continue to explore and ponder, I always want to be open to tweaking my approach! One question has especially led me to consider adding a “fourth branch” to my classification (it’s the first question listed below). But while I’m at it, I figured I would ask for further input. So if you’ve got any thoughts on these things, please fire away!

The big questions:

  1. Collegiate Church Planting is a major strategy employed on a significant number of campuses. Should it be considered a fourth branch of college ministry, or does it fit better under one of the present branches?
  2. Should campus-based ministry be split into two branches: denominational / church-related and fully parachurch?
  3. Should ministries run entirely by students be considered a separate branch of college ministry?
  4. What’s the best term for Branch #3? “Spiritual development at Christian colleges”? “Chaplaincy”? Something else?
  5. Any other adjustments you would make to this system?

Please feel free to weigh in – I’d love to hear your thoughts, arguments, questions, additions, or concerns!

written from my 7th Motel 6 in 9 days (in Vallejo, CA)

—————————————————————————————

[Click to comment or see any comments on this post!]

Road Trip 13: Day 9 recap
exploring Cal State Chico, and then down to the Bay Area
T-shirt: the Fighting Illini of University of Illinois
today: Stanford and other Bay Area fun

You might have noticed that my preference is to call the amazing thing we get to do on a day-to-day basis “college ministry” instead of the various other options out there.

Here’s why I’ve gone this way, and why you might wanna at least consider using this nomenclature yourself when you talk about our profession. (Of course, I’d also love your comments and arguments for other options!)

This only refers to how we talk about our field as a whole. I don’t think it matters as much when individual ministries use various terms.

Here are what seem to be the main options for referring to our field as a whole:

University Ministry

This one’s easy: “University Ministry” simply doesn’t apply to all work with college students, ’cause many students aren’t at a school that considers itself a “university.”

While this may work for a local ministry, as an entire field it doesn’t make a lot of sense.

Student Ministry

“Student ministry” is used as a synonym for “youth ministry” in a huge number of cases; other times it’s used to denote ministry to both youth and college students (as a division in a church, for example).

Using this to describe our profession will never cause anything but confusion… and we don’t get first dibs, anyway. Youth Ministry is well ahead of us in field-development, so they probably own this one, whether we like it or not. (But either way, both groups are students, so it seems like neither Youth Ministry nor we are best served by using this name.)

Collegiate Ministry

I honestly really like this one as a way to distinguish our entire profession, but I’m not sure it will ever catch on. It’s too close to “college ministry,” and people will probably shorten it, anyway. It can also sound a little snooty, a little self-important as we speak to those outside of our field.

You will certainly see me sprinkle this one into my writing, however. It’s great when I need a synonym, especially when I’m talking about the field as a whole.

Campus Ministry

Ah, this is extremely common. But here’s why I don’t personally lean toward this one:

  • It often connotes, rightly or wrongly, campus-based ministry (parachurch or denominational ministries). I have heard many people use “campus ministry” as the opposite of church-based college ministry. But that use of “campus ministry” isn’t standard enough for it to be a true synonym for campus-based ministry.
  • Some use “campus ministry” specifically to describe the spiritual life department of Christian colleges (particularly, I’ve noticed, in Catholic colleges). Do a Twitter search yourself, and you’ll see that use come up regularly. That is certainly one branch of college ministry, but it makes it confusing for describing the whole profession.
  • “Campus ministry” is also occasionally used to describe – get this – youth ministry. Yes, high schools are “campuses,” too, and I know at least one fellow minister who bought a book on “campus ministry” just to find out that… well, you can guess.

Still, I use the term “campus ministry” plenty – especially because I know people will search the web or Twitter for that term. I have no problem being helpful or fitting in, but it isn’t my favorite terminology for the reasons mentioned above.

College Ministry

After all that, I think we’re only left with good ol’ “college ministry.” This does seem to be the term most recognizable to the largest number of people as just what it is: ministry to college students. And yet it doesn’t distinguish between the various forms of ministry (or the types of schools).

So that’s my argument. Take it as the analyzations of a college ministry nerd (or a campus ministry nerd, if that’s what you prefer!). What do you think?

—————————————————————————————

[Click to comment / see any comments on this post!]

For a couple of years now, I’ve had one presupposition that has driven my journeys, actions, and thoughts. It continues to be at the front of my mind as I work to help Collegiate Ministry – as a field – progress from where it is to a stronger place.

Here’s the presupposition:

The biggest help anyone can provide for College Ministry (right now) is raising its value in the mind of Christians.

There are many problems and much lack within college ministry. Naming a whole bunch of things that we certainly need is easy enough, because our field is underdeveloped. We can (and should) point out the need for everything from books… to funds… to better methodologies… to organizations that advance our cause.

But those very things have a “Z Factor,” an issue that affects EACH of those things. The root of the problem, why things seem so out-of-sorts here, why we feel like we’re walking uphill when making these changes – is because American Christians don’t generally acknowledge how much college ministry matters.

When college ministry matters, we all acknowledge the many people who are serving campuses and students in awesome ways.

When college ministry matters, people give money.

When college ministry matters, people demand books on college ministry… and buy books on college ministry… Therefore, when college ministry matters, books are commissioned and published.

When college ministry matters, more college ministers arise (and there are lots of college ministry jobs).

When college ministry matters, the desire increases for efficiency and wisdom and creativity and skill and training in college ministry.

When college ministry matters, college ministers see the need to improve our work. (Yes, I think we too could better value the work we do.) Therefore collaboration increases – through sit-downs, blogs, podcasts, informal training, formal training, reading, ministry visits, conferences… Discussions – both academic and practical – are rampant (when college ministry matters). And the cream rises to the top, so those discussions just get better and better over time.

When college ministry matters, more high school Christians plan to join a college ministry when they get to school.

When college ministry matters, students are reached better, and more of ‘em are reached.

God is glorified in the campuses like never before.

When college ministry matters.

So if you can only pray for one thing to help the field called College Ministry, I’d encourage praying for this. If you can only work on one thing to help College Ministry, think about working on this (first).

We should keep doing the other things – writing books, training others, starting seminary courses, blogging, collaborating, donating, and so on – more and more, as much as we can. But everything will involve more people and be easier, better, and more effective once the value of college ministry is raised in the hearts and minds of Christians.

So if you have to pick a priority for your college ministry improvement schedule, please consider this for your Number First. You can start by telling people where you are how much college ministry matters. Or run an ad in the Super Bowl! Use the free book if it helps, or get some testimonies together, or write something of your own. Or use any influence God’s given you to “plug” this area that receives such disproportionate attention. But if you have the opportunity, do something.

It’ll be a really good day… when college ministry matters.

—————————————————————————————

[Click to comment / see any comments on this post!]

This is the 3rd post in a series on Jimmy Fallon’s Millennial methods. See all of ‘em here.

One of the clearest, most obvious (jarring?) surprises about Jimmy Fallon’s version of Late Night is his use of active “guest experiences.”

From the first night, in which he had Robert DeNiro dressed up like an astronaut for a goofy little skit, Fallon stands out in this one aspect perhaps more than any other. While his fellow late night talkers certainly venture “supra-interview” with guests on occasion (such as in Conan’s “In the Year 2000″ recurring piece), it’s a rare treat – not the modus operandi.

But with Jimmy Fallon, it’s clearly the M.O., and the guests are surprisingly cooperative. Jimmy playing Tiger Woods in Wii Golf on the streets of NYC, Drew Barrymore licking a bowling ball for $10, Cameron Diaz snuggling with 48 bunnies in a hammock to set a world record, Jimmy competing with Serena Williams (and Betty White) in beer pong… The list of surprising “celebrexperiences” goes on and on through Fallon’s four months.

And that’s not all! The studio audience participates, too, at a new – and more genuine – level. Letterman’s “Stupid Pet [or Human] Tricks” is participation by “normal people” – but it’s tightly-controlled, prepared participation. Meanwhile, Dave’s into-the-audience excursions (like Conan’s or Jay’s) really just use audience members as props for written jokes. Fallon, meanwhile, makes use of audience members in all sorts of ways – sometimes as “props,” certainly, but plenty of times as true “participants” in goofy games or semi-sketches. And it’s telling that they often come right on stage to “star” in this way.

This is all another way Fallon’s approach is textbook when it comes to reaching a Millennial audience: it’s full of participatory experience. (In one rerun I saw last week, ridiculous activities involving the whole audience were indeed aptly titled, “Shared Experiences.”)

A single segment of the new Late Night might turn out to be “just an interview,” sure. But we never really know what’s coming, and there’s a good chance by the time the hour is up that we home viewers have vicariously enjoyed a good romp, a happy contest, or some other sort of larger-than-interview experience.

And that’s one important note: I don’t know that the home audience has to be participating to enjoy the “participatory experience” factor. (You wouldn’t think watching a “Shared Experience” would be enjoyable, but it kinda was.) And there are plenty of chances for true home participation, too, through web content and Twittering and probably other things I haven’t noticed yet.

Troy Patterson of Slate summed it up nicely after only Fallon’s first episode:

Evidence suggests that Late Night With Jimmy Fallon is not a normal talk show—or even an abnormal talk show in the self-ironic tradition Letterman pioneered—but a mutant multimedia experience, part chatfest and part reality show. It is an R&D attempt to reinvent the format for the way we live now (as perceived by a network generally agreed to have no idea what it is doing but—anything’s possible—may even be on to something). This involves hyperactive interactivity and abundant oversharing.

(That “abundant oversharing” is part of what I wrote about last time: Fallon’s use of authenticity.)

So this is another way Late Night with Jimmy Fallon offers us tips on ministry to Millennials. This doesn’t mean (necessarily) that last decade’s youth group games are next decade’s church service experiences. But if we want to reflect our audience and connect with our audience, creating “participatory experiences” (involving them or us) is one available way. Some of these experiences will be fellowshippy, some will be learning moments. All can be memorable.

And if you need ideas for this, just watch a little Late Night. (You won’t have to watch for long.)

For the other posts about Gen Y and Jimmy Fallon, click here.

To see some of Late Night’s participatory experiences involving the studio audience, there’s actually a helpful list at Wikipedia.

And obviously, I’m not condoning beer pong. C’mon.

—————————————————————————————

[Click to comment / see any comments on this post!]

Post #2 in a series on Jimmy Fallon’s connection to / reflection of Millennials!

The night of his version of Late Night debuted, I noticed that Jimmy Fallon looked really earnest as he ran his way through the streets of New York City to host his very own, brand new talk show in the big city. After that fitting intro airs nightly, a quite dapper-though-goofy Fallon strides out to a stage he seems just a little uncomfortable with.

And he might just seem a little uncomfortable with his entire production, as numerous blogs and articles have noticed. The very first episode seemed almost rigged to produce both nervousness and awkwardness; no young buck picks DeNiro as a first guest in order to sail smoothly. Fallon regularly laughs at his own jokes, shrugs off the (many) jokes that flop (or gives the cue card to someone in the audience), and he certainly doesn’t hide the fact that he wants people to like him.

Fallon & DeNiro from www.latenightwithjimmyfallon.com

But the funny thing is that people actually may. And I think this “goofiness” is part of Fallon’s attractiveness to Millennials, which I began posting about earlier this week.

Here’s my theory: I think (subconsciously?) Millennials can see goofiness a signpost for authenticity. And authenticity is really key for connecting with those gals and guys. Where Gen Xers may cynically doubt that anyone can truly be authentic, Millennials are more optimistic – but they demand it!

And in some real ways, discomfort, awkward moments, goofy earnestness, and the like could help viewers believe they’re getting “the real Jimmy Fallon.” Can those things be manufactured? Of course they can. But in Fallon’s case, any postured goofiness would have to pre-date his Saturday Night Live days, where his earnestness and uncontrollable laughter abounded. And he’s clearly attempting to be funny – and, in the opinion of many, often failing. So I don’t think his awkwardness is a put-on.

What’s interesting, though, and important for us ministers to note, is that likability might just trump laughter (or any other “skillfulness” or “slickness” we’re aiming for in our own contexts).

Meanwhile, every joke that bombs, every guest interview with awkward moments, even the self-deprecating turn as his own staff’s whipping boy in fake-reality-show “Seventh Floor West” may have down sides, but they also earn Fallon authenticity points. So do the occasional personal revelations, like Jimmy’s excitement over receiving his long-awaited college degree from the school he dropped out of, or the highly normal personal photos on the show’s website.

Millennials want to believe that there are REAL people and REAL organizations out there. And they themselves have been pretty willing to expose their lives – to a fault – on blogs and social networks and more. Ministry to them will work best when they can see that we’re being authentic.

Not all of us are naturally goofy – so don’t go creating that persona – but authenticity can have plenty of other signposts. For many of us, simply relaxing our guard will lead to “revelations of realness” soon enough; others may need to try hard to (wisely) sprinkle some “me-ness” amidst the “Him-ness” and “you-ness” of our ministries. However we reveal our authentic selves, our college students (and other Gen Y-ers) will be glad to see it.

Making my Christmas list was rather difficult in the midst of a year-long Road Trip! What do you get the man who has no room in his Nissan-home? Books ended up as a large portion of the list, since there’s not much else I can take with me.

And as it turns out, Santa read my list, and I did get a lot of books this week. Some of ‘em were books I knew I’d like, while others were rather “experimental.” But I hear a lot about the lack of Collegiate-focused books during my trip, and I love finding good principles in unexpected places.
I thought my new books might interest you, as well – hopefully you’ve got some Christmas cash to spend! Here are the first of the tomes I found under the tree this year. More to come tomorrow.

These two are admittedly out-of-the-blue, just-found-it-on-Amazon volumes – I think I just searched “college ministry” one day. But both look pretty interesting, in fact. Despite some theological differences, I betcha I find some helpful notions, too. The authors are college chaplains in mainline denominations, and those venues (campus administration and the mainline denoms) do seem to provide fertile ground for research, writing, and thinking.

Ed Stetzer, head of Lifeway Research, is one of the giant church-thinkers these days, and I’m excited to read this book to learn “how 300 churches turned around and yours can too.” But this sort of book also helps on the Road Trip, by suggesting churches to visit next semester as well as giving characteristics to notice in the churches I do explore. That’s the same reason I’m excited about Jim & Casper. Like its quasi-sequel, I Sold My Soul on eBay, this book should give me more to think about while spending a year as an official Church Visitor. Finally, Colleges That Change Lives, despite making some unique choices for its “top 40,” will give me even more suggestions for next semester’s venues.

Tim Elmore mentioned these two new books at Ivy Jungle, and his title-dropping is good enough for me. (I foolishly ignored his repeated recommendations of Good to Great for years. Boo!) Plus, the first book deals with helping employees connect with what they were made to do. While they’re certainly not our employees, students, student leaders, and adult volunteers have dreams, too. That’s a theme that has fascinated me of late. Meanwhile, Microtrends studies the impact small communities of people can have on the world. Sound like something we hope for?

More books tomorrow! [Here's that post.]

Welcome to Exploring College Ministry

After ministering to college students for 8 years, my calling moved to advancing the entire field of College Ministry in every way I can. So I've spent the last 5 years exploring it very broadly (including a yearlong road trip), publishing a free book (Reaching the Campus Tribes), speaking, consulting, writing, and working on other projects - all to serve college ministers! To learn more, explore the header links or the tools below.

...and if I can help your ministry directly (or you want to support my mission), contact me!

Categories

Enter your email address to get new posts by email.

Join 37 other followers

Twitter

Posts from the Past

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers